1. Introduction
In this tutorial, we’ll explore different approaches to finding the maximum difference between any two elements in an array of integers in Java. We’ll demonstrate the problem using an example array with ten random integers ranging from -10 to 10. First, we’ll go over the problem and its challenges to understand common pitfalls. We’ll then explore different algorithms to solve this problem, starting from a naive approach and gradually moving toward more optimized solutions.
2. Problem Definition
Finding the maximum difference between two elements in an array has numerous practical applications. For instance, in Data Analysis we’ll need to identify the largest difference between data points, while in Stock Price Analysis we’d need to calculate the maximum profit between buy and sell prices. In Game Development, as well, we’ll need to compute the maximum distance between different points (e.g., player positions or scores).
Given an array of integers, our task is to identify the elements with the largest absolute difference, as well as their corresponding indices, and the values those indices point to. We’ll explore several methods for solving this problem, each with different time and space complexity.
3. Brute Force Approach
The brute-force approach is the simplest and most intuitive. We compare every possible pair of elements to calculate their difference. This method has a time complexity of O(n^2), making it inefficient for large arrays:
public static int[] findMaxDifferenceBruteForce(int[] list) {
int maxDifference = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
int minIndex = 0, maxIndex = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < list.length - 1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < list.length; j++) {
int difference = Math.abs(list[j] - list[i]);
if (difference > maxDifference) {
maxDifference = difference;
minIndex = i;
maxIndex = j;
}
}
}
int[] result = new int[] { minIndex, maxIndex, list[minIndex], list[maxIndex], maxDifference };
return result;
}
This approach checks every pair of elements, making it simple to implement but inefficient. Even though it displays a space complexity of O(1), for larger arrays, the O(n^2) time complexity makes it impractical. The method iterates over all pairs of elements to identify the maximum difference.
We’ll test our approach with an array, as follows:
@Test
public void givenAnArray_whenUsingBruteForce_thenReturnCorrectMaxDifferenceInformation() {
int[] list = {3, -10, 7, 1, 5, -3, 10, -2, 6, 0};
int[] result = MaxDifferenceBruteForce.findMaxDifferenceBruteForce(list);
assertArrayEquals(new int[]{1, 6, -10, 10, 20}, result);
}
4. TreeSet (Balanced Tree) Approach
A more advanced approach is to use a TreeSet to maintain a dynamically sorted collection of elements. This allows us to quickly retrieve the minimum and maximum elements during traversal:
public static int[] findMaxDifferenceTreeSet(int[] list) {
TreeSet<Integer> set = new TreeSet<>();
for (int num : list) {
set.add(num);
}
int minValue = set.first();
int maxValue = set.last();
int minIndex = 0;
int maxIndex = list.length - 1;
for (int i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
if (list[i] == minValue) {
minIndex = i;
} else if (list[i] == maxValue) {
maxIndex = i;
}
}
int maxDifference = Math.abs(maxValue - minValue);
int[] result = new int[] { minIndex, maxIndex, list[minIndex], list[maxIndex], maxDifference };
return result;
}
Using a TreeSet allows for dynamic updates and efficient retrieval of the minimum and maximum values in O(n*log(n)) time. Nevertheless, this solution needs to store the entire array, thus offering a space complexity of O(n).
We run the same test case on our TreeSet implementation, as well:
@Test
public void givenAnArray_whenUsingTreeSet_thenReturnCorrectMaxDifferenceInformation() {
int[] list = {3, -10, 7, 1, 5, -3, 10, -2, 6, 0};
int[] result = MaxDifferenceTreeSet.findMaxDifferenceTreeSet(list);
assertArrayEquals(new int[]{1, 6, -10, 10, 20}, result);
}
5. Optimized Single Pass Approach
To improve efficiency, we can traverse the array once while tracking the minimum and update the maximum difference if the current difference is greater. This reduces the time complexity to O(n) while still keeping the space complexity to O(1):
public static int[] findMaxDifferenceOptimized(int[] list) {
int minElement = list[0];
int maxElement = list[0];
int minIndex = 0;
int maxIndex = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < list.length; i++) {
if (list[i] < minElement) {
minElement = list[i];
minIndex = i;
}
if (list[i] > maxElement) {
maxElement = list[i];
maxIndex = i;
}
}
int maxDifference = Math.abs(maxElement - minElement);
int[] result = new int[] { minIndex, maxIndex, list[minIndex], list[maxIndex], maxDifference };
return result;
}
This approach is much more efficient. It iterates over the array once, updating the minimum element and calculating the maximum difference dynamically. This method yields the same result as the brute-force approach but with a time complexity of O(n), making it suitable for large arrays.
We test the correctness of our implementation by running a test with the same inputs and expecting the same outputs, as for the brute force approach:
@Test
public void givenAnArray_whenUsingOptimizedOnePass_thenReturnCorrectMaxDifferenceInformation() {
int[] list = {3, -10, 7, 1, 5, -3, 10, -2, 6, 0};
int[] result = MaxDifferenceOptimized.findMaxDifferenceOptimized(list);
assertArrayEquals(new int[]{1, 6, -10, 10, 20}, result);
}
6. Common Pitfalls
Here are some pitfalls that may arise in this problem:
- Handling multiple pairs with the same maximum difference: Each of the presented approaches returns only a single pair of indices with the maximum difference, though there may be multiple valid pairs.
- Input constraints: In cases where input values have known constraints, early termination could be achieved by stopping once we encounter the maximum possible difference.
- Negative Values and Absolute Differences: Although we address this one, it’s worth mentioning that when both maximum and minimum elements are negative, the difference must be calculated in absolute terms to ensure correctness.
7. Conclusion
In this tutorial, we explored multiple approaches to finding the maximum difference between two elements in an array. We began with a brute-force solution, which was simple but inefficient, and progressed to more optimized methods.
The optimized single-pass approach is the most efficient for this problem, providing a time complexity of O(n) and minimal space usage. We also explored the TreeSet approach, which offers flexibility at the cost of performance in terms of both space and time complexity.
The complete source code for this article can be found over on GitHub.